Gavin Webb: Libertarian councillor for Stoke & Trent Vale

Today, I have issued an email – copied below – to all councillors on Stoke-on-Trent City Council calling on them to support a request that the entire City Council budget – warts and all – be published for all councillors and taxpayers to view and make recommendations upon.

Dear Fellow Councillors

You may recall that since my election in 2007 and on several occasions at past full council meetings I have publicly called for a complete breakdown of the City Council budget so that councillors and members of the public are able to look through it in order to decide areas to cut, improve and indeed stop providing altogether.

My requests have unfortunately been derided by many Members, and indeed, the information I requested has not been forthcoming from our current Resources portfolio holder Councillor Kieran Clarke (who at the full council meeting on 26 February claimed that such information would be difficult to provide), and by his predecessor, Councillor Mike Tappin. You may recall that at this meeting I voted against the Medium Term Financial Strategy and the Corporate Plan as I believed them both to illustrate how the council was doing too much, and that this was perpetuating the nanny state that restricted citizens doing things for themselves.

It is therefore no secret that I believe councillors should have been cutting back on the size of the council, how much it spends, and how much it does for people. It is no secret that I believe that residents should have less reliance on the ‘authorities’ to provide services for them and that they should be doing more for themselves. Unfortunately, many fellow councillors since 2007 have frankly mocked such views.

It appears now that my mindset is now the prevailing paradigm. Indeed it is interesting to note some of the quotes by senior bureaucrats highlighted at the beginning the recent MTFS presentation to council members where . . “Our public debt is hitting Armaggedon levels” (Steve Bundred, Chief Executive Audit Office); “Bloodbath in public finances” (CIPD June 2009); “Councils have a £4bn deficit” (LGA August 2009); and the quote that particularly struck me as being at least two years too late . . . “We are talking about double digit percentage drops. I think possibly 30 or 40% of current resources . . . we are talking about stopping doing things and maybe a rebalancing of those things we expect a private citizen to do and what we expect the public sector to do” (Roger Lathan, CIPFA President March 2009).

When I have given warnings such as these at scrutiny, at full council, and indeed privately with many of you, I’m afraid I haven’t been filled with confidence that fellow council members have the backbone to exercise the cuts needed to bring the public finances back into good order, and in the process, really re-empower residents to have greater control over their own lives and, working with their neighbours, their communities.

Yesterday, I met with Paul Simpson, Director of Central Services to discuss the issue pertaining to the City Council’s budget. It is clear that much needs to be done.

During the meeting I requested, once again, a full breakdown of the City Council’s budget and Paul Simpson has agreed that though it will require a little time to collate it in a format that is clear and understandable, that this is possible. However, he would prefer that if such information was being released that it was available to all members of the council, hence my reason for emailing you.

Would you like a full breakdown of the City Council budget? I don’t mean just headings of specific sections of the council which have been presented to scrutiny in the past by officers, I mean the minutiae right down to how much is being spent on cleaning up dog muck and mowing grass verges – things that perhaps local residents should be more in charge of tackling and owning.

I have also requested in the past, and once again I requested it yesterday at the meeting, that I would also like this information to also be published on the City Council website, stoke.gov.uk, in order that the public is able to see where money is being spent. Of course, this would require there being some differentiation between services paid for using monies raised locally, and those that are paid for using monies obtained by the council from Central Government or some non-elected Quango. There is an opportunity to engage with taxpayers over where their money is to be spent (or not as the case may be). It is after all taxpayers’ money, not the Council’s.

I think we can all agree that it is best if all the facts and figures are presented to us in order that we are all – including the taxpayer – able to make an informed contribution to the debate on where savings must be made. If you agree with having all the facts and figures, please ‘Reply To All’ as Paul Simpson has been copied into this email.

All the best

Gavin

Gavin Webb, Libertarian Party Councillor for Stoke and Trent Vale
Stoke-on-Trent City Council
07949 026660

Now, though it all looks quite bleak on the finance front, I am looking at this with a ‘glass half full’ mindset.  I believe there is an exciting opportunity for the City Council to cut back on quite a bit it does in order to give responsibility back to individuals and their communities.  To achieve this however, it requires fellow City Councillors of all parties and none to have faith in the ability of the individual to take on those responsibilities.

Of course, there is probably the issue that many individuals lack the skills and confidence needed to assume such responsibilities, which is in large part the result of a huge welfare state that has led to individuals becoming increasingly dependent.  This is why I’ve consistently said that if the council is to do anything, it should facilitate individuals to become independent of government support and gradually wean them off the State.

Unfortunately, as with all bureaucracies, and the bureaucrats and politicians within them, their reason to exist appears primarily to be about self-preservation.  As such, these bureaucracies are not open to new ideas, especially if they threaten their existence.  They throw cold water on any opinion that they are not needed by claiming that their ’services’ are essential, and that any other alternatives are ‘not workable’.  In effect, these bureaucracies continue to grow to unsustainable and crippling levels, and it is us normal folk who always feel the pain in terms of increased taxes and greater restrictions on our personal freedom.

Eventually, we end up with the situation that the City Council finds itself in – running around like Corporal Jones in Dad’s Army shouting “Don’t Panic, Don’t Panic!”

Labour, Conservative, Lib Dem and the City Independent representatives – all of whom have had a part to play in the running of the council – have refused to be open-minded to other, non-State ways of doing things, proclaiming either that the people aren’t ready to take responsibility for themselves, their families and communities; or by scare-mongering (as is unfortunately so common with politicians) by referring to more voluntarist, free market approaches as being akin to ‘Anarchism’ or right-wing extremism.

Indeed, when I suggested last year that the lower taxes, better government Taxpayers Alliance do some free consultancy for the City Council by going through the books line-by-line, I remember Labour councillor Mike Barnes being almost apopleptic in his opposition to this evil right-wing organisation.  As far as I was concerned he could have invited in his socialist chums to have a look at the books too but instead he chose to criticise and dismiss instead of opening his mind to all possibilities.

And if anyone thinks the BNP are any different, think again.  This bunch of small ‘c’ conservatives who have a thing against people who are not white and ‘British’ are as much a part of the establishment as the rest of the parties.  They don’t believe ordinary folk have the ability or intelligence to take care of themselves.  They instead look at people not as individuals but as a collective – as ‘Britons’, or ‘Blacks’, or ‘Not White’.  Individual rights, that is, true human rights play no part in their politics or their rhetoric.

Personal freedom and individual responsibility.  Doesn’t that sound better than large government and high taxes?  This is an exciting opportunity to give back to each and every person in Stoke-on-Trent control over his or her life, and it is an opportunity that must not be missed.

Gavin Webb, who was selected as the Liberal Democrat prospective parliamentary candidate for Burton in 2008 and elected as a Lib Dem councillor on Stoke-on-Trent City Council in 2007, has today announced that he has resigned from the Liberal Democrats.

He says: “I have made a good many friends in my fourteen years of activism in the Liberal Democrats and I hope that those friendships will continue, but regretfully I have decided to resign from the Liberal Democrats.

“The party, like the Conservative and Labour parties, has become a party of the establishment. It has unfortunately firmly wedded itself to the belief that there are primarily government solutions to the problems facing our country, and in the process, they are adopting policies that undermine our rights and freedoms as individuals.

“As far as I can see, most political parties in the UK appear to trust individuals when it comes to voting for councillors, MPs and MEPs, but once comfortably in power they are reluctant to trust individuals when it comes to them making choices about their own lives.

“There is however one political party – the Libertarian Party – that believes in giving responsibility back to individuals over their own lives and their own finances; and it is this party that I have now decided to join.

“We are on the road of authoritarianism, where government is our ruler rather than us being the ruler of our government. It is time for each and every single one of us to make a stand against government and those who feed off it, and demand the reduction of its size and scope.

“From what I’ve seen from many Lib Dem parliamentarians and councillors I don’t believe the Liberal Democrat Party has the inclination to argue for smaller government in defence of our individual rights.

“Though there are some good classical liberal and libertarian types in the party, with whom I hope to continue to have a good relationship, their voices are crowded out by people who believe it perfectly okay to dictate to people how they should live their lives. I don’t wish any longer to be a part of that.

“As an active member of the Libertarian Party, I will campaign to inform people that there are more voluntary, rather than coercive ways in which to influence positive outcomes for themselves, their families and the wider community. I hope to impress upon people that though there may be a need for government of some sort, it doesn’t have to be government of the size and expense we see today.”

Libertarian Party Leader Ian Parker-Joseph said:

“It has been a pleasure over the past months to speak with Gavin on numerous occasions, and following a meeting with him last month can attest to his personal commitment to the libertarian values on which he was elected, a man of honour, integrity and a passion for doing the right thing for his constituents.

“I am therefore very pleased on behalf of The Libertarian Party to welcome Gavin Webb into the only party that wholly and uniquely stands for libertarian ideals in the UK.

“I know that there is a great sadness from Gavin that the Liberal Democrat leadership were unable to rise to the challenge of veering away from the belief that the State has the answers to all our ills. It is a sadness shared by many.

“In that light I hope that there are many more who now see the time as right to make the same changes that Gavin Webb has undertaken, not just from the Lib Dems but also those in the Conservative Libertarian wing who are unsuccessfully looking for reforms that will never come, and instead to look to a party that believes in libertarianism as a way of life, rather than one which merely gives lip service to it.

“The Libertarian Party is here to stay, and new members such as Gavin Webb can only enhance the message that his constituents so clearly wanted to hear, and that Gavin Webb is living on their behalf.”

Libertarian Party Chairman Andrew Withers said:

“Whilst we have a number of Parish and Town Councillors, Gavin is the first City Councillor that has crossed the floor to a truly Radical Party, one that wants to change the relationship between State and the Individual to the point where the State is subordinate to the will of the people, not the people subordinate to the will of the State.

“Furthermore, the Libertarian Party argues that State should be small and accountable.

“We welcome Gavin, and hope that his decision will galvanise other libertarians in other parties to join with us on the long march back to individual liberty.”